Categories
First Year Thinking & Doing Sound Visiting Practitioners Visiting Practitioners

Sampling:

Throughout my work, I decided to use sampling. This is a new skill that I have adopted and although it reaches a more contemporary audience I found the concept intriguing and it provoked a lot of wider moral reflection in me. Since it was coined in the late 1970’s it has become more and more popular among several genres of art. Vicky Bennet is a widely known Sound Artist who famously uses sampling to her advantage in order of creating art. Her piece ‘The Sound Of Ehe End Of Music- People Like Us’ portrays Oscar Hammerstein II and Richard Rodger’s pieces being distorted and played to her contrasting artwork and 60’s rock music shaped onto graphic images of Vietnam war footage. Despite its highly juxtaposing ideas and aesthetics, it works in unison to create its perfect artistic harmony.

Many could argue that sampling is classed as a form of copying; Stealing other people’s work. However, art is produced to be shared and shown off and in order of taking someone’s work, it only plays to its purpose. I almost see it myself as a compliment. To have the desire to involve someone else’s artistic practice within your work speaks to me as if you admire their artistic creativity and would want to use it to enhance your work in places you couldn’t. 

As an artist myself I could see the negative effects of this and the annoyance of someone taking credit for something they didn’t 100% do. However, as long as the artist mentions who and what they have sampled and does this in only a complimentary way then I do believe that this is ok. Finally, I believe that the sampled work must go alongside the artist’s artistic touch and should not be the prime characteristic.

Despite the questions about sampling I will continue to use this but ensure that I am certainly sticking to my own set of rules and guidelines to keep this morally correct.

Categories
Visiting Practitioners

Pamala Z – Visiting Practitioner

Within Pamala Z’s lecture, many things stood out to me. In particular, her confidence and ideas of using the human voice within composition spoke to me. I loved this section as it inspired me to think about using vocals as the main source in the future. 

Within her piece ‘Breathing’, she uses just her own voice to create the entire piece by manipulating and mixing her voice through a 21 channel self-made sound installation. How she used the breathe throughout stuck with me. It became extremely emotional and peeled back the human voice to its rarest form. Her instincts to include breath provoked such emotion that certain instruments can not. I have used voice in the past within my work however I have never manipulated and layered it to create a solo piece in the way Pamala did. I hope to do this in the future and isolate only vocals to create an entire sound piece.

Within another performance, Pamala used a score of different vocals to create different sounds melodies and harmonies. By isolating just the voice as the main instrument; the lines between art and reality became blurred. It was as if human instincts and nature were manipulated into music and sound. I found this beautiful as it supported the concept of art and reality being not so far apart after all. The way the voices intertwined with one another sounded to me like water in the brain. 

One of the sounds reminded me greatly of the song “The Great Gig In The Sky” by pink Floyd. Where the voice is used as the soul of the song and the main instrument throughout. Despite cultural changes and traditions; the human voice stands as the most universal instrument we as a society can share. Sounds can be used as a multilingual language and can provoke emotions that speak universally.

Categories
First Year Sound Artists Thinking & Doing Sound Visiting Practitioners

The advancement of technology and how it has affected creative performance:

Christina Wheelers lecture made me reflect on her views on creative performance. Christina talked about the endless opportunities in which performance and sound art can be presented. She asked questions such as, where and how should the audience be positioned? Where should the performance be shown? How should they hear the sound, and where would the sound be played. In my previous blog posts, I have talked about the importance and effects spatiality can have upon sound; how the room in which sound is played is an additional instrument in itself. In a study by ‘Yueying Li’, she claims “an increasing number of theories and studies addressing spatial topics have argued that these two fields are closely linked and one would not be complete without the other”. Without exploring speciality your sound would have no uniqueness and space within the audio. I truly believe that this area has only been able to be truly explored due to the rise in technology. Before the 1900’s sound was limited and concert halls stood as the heart for live performance. This generic positioning of audience and performer has been able to outlive itself thanks to new realms of technological advancements. With arrays of speakers and microphones; sound can be heard from different directions meaning that the audience themselves can also change direction. The advancements in a film it has allowed a parallel for sound and can create artistic performances in any format or area.

Thanks to these advancements it has not only allowed space to affect the initial audio and recording it has also allowed effect to take place during performance. Experimenting with your surroundings can change the way in which the audience portrays your piece. I find this interesting as I believe it can add another layer to my work and create a more immersive experience. Vicky Bennet showed us a clear example with her exhibition performance ‘Gone, Gone Beyond 360’ where she incorporated the visuals of a 360-degree screen. After all, the way your listener views your piece is the most important aim of creating it in the first place. I hope to use this in future performances to capture a true aesthetic and mood in line with my artwork. It will help me go to that extra length of expanding the listeners mind and opening areas for them to feel my work rather than listen.

In conclusion advancements within technology have allowed room for us to break the barrier between audience and performer and create harmony for everyone to experience art at its fullest capability. The advancement of technology and how it has affected creative performance:

Categories
First Year Visiting Practitioners

Richard Pheonix – Visiting Practioner

During Richard’s talk, he mentioned his work within different variations of disability groups and music bands. He expressed his shock when he first visited a punk rock gig for people with learning difficulties. This being his first-ever interaction within this environment he talked about how incredible and unique the music and the experience was. I went away and thought about this concept in great depth. Human positionality depicts their genre and area of music- however, it does not mean it’s the only thing you will ever like or know! So don’t settle! Richard’s previous experiences in the music scene prior to this were underground rock bands. Despite this being the same genre this was still a completely unique experience due to its members and the environment in which the gig was held. Music has no barrier or class structure, yet humans decide to put one there. Why should one genre decide your life path, attitude, fashion, or personality? This brought my attention to the music scene in the ’80s where “mods” and “rockers” formed a full physical and mental divide truly based on their genre of music. Richard’s interactions and close interest in disability music prove to me that despite your positionality genres and barriers can be knocked down as it is us who create them. Music can not always be liked by everyone but opinions over the years have formed blockades within society even on things that are entirely away from the music. I learned from this to never position myself within one area of music and to continue through life with an open ear to sound and music. Not allowing music to control you as a being but only to teach you is something that many people should think about. Positionality forms you as a person and what you surround yourself with. However, barriers should not be formed because of this.

Categories
First Year Visiting Practitioners

Sam Auinger – Harmonic Bridge

Sam Auinger a ‘Sonic Thinker’ meaning he basis his philosophy upon his aural experience of the world. He often focuses in on the idea of Urban Planning. I connect to the idea of this as I can appreciate his understanding for using all the sound we have around us. This was reflected in his 1998 installation piece ‘MASS MoCA’. He used the existing car sounds taken from a road bridge and built a speaker which would play the sound of live traffic and turn it into a cloud of sound. What once was known to separate the town from the museum had now become what’s known as a harmonic cathedral! I think this shows Auinger’s ambition to not only reunite society physically but also reunite lost noise and noise we become aware of. Using the sound to create such a harmonic humming reflects his views on sonic thinking and using the sound in which is around us. I hope to use this in the future by either creating sound with field recordings or existing sound. He not only uses singular sounds but also engineers them to become something enjoyable and easy to the ear; linking back to his efforts to reunite lost sound and sound we consciously hear. He closely works alongside artist Bruce Odland together becoming ‘O+A’ where they closely focus upon hearing perspective within large public spaces. Creating work such as Sonic commons bringing many foregrounds as to why and how people perceive sound within urban spaces. Making noise into conscious listening! https://vimeo.com/71463497